Still, I think a lot of folks would feel a bit uneasy having hundreds of dollars' worth of conspicuous-looking lights unsecured in their lawn. Couple that with the smart color control, and you might have enough reasons to splurge. Even if you're just getting two, you'll need to spend a total of $220, which is quite a lot compared with other garden-style path lights, including ones with built-in solar panels.Īt 640 lumens each, the Calla path lights are much brighter than lights like those. With a single-light starter kit that includes the power supply costing an exorbitant $130, I also wish that they were less expensive, especially since you'll probably want at least a couple of them. They're a bit thick and bulky for my tastes. We've currently got these color-changing pedestal lights illuminating the CNET Smart Home's veggie garden. The Calla pedestal lights, seen here lighting up the CNET Smart Home's garden, are expensive and a bit bulky. Hopefully Philips will head back to the drawing board and come up with an improved design. Both are significant limitations - if you need anything other than 2 or 5 meters' worth of color-changing light, you're out of luck. They look better on the ground, lighting up a garden - but Philips doesn't include any way to stake the things down, meaning you'll need to figure something out for yourself.Īnother big problem: You can't buy extensions for the strips like you can for the indoor versions, and you can't cut them shorter like you can with the indoor strips, either. The thick, rubbery exterior surrounding the LEDs is much too bulky, making it near impossible to hide the strips under a railing, like we tried on the deck at the CNET Smart Home. Lots of folks were excited when Philips announced a new, weatherproof version of its popular light strips, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. Philips Hue's outdoor light strips are bulky, and you can't cut or extend them, which makes it tough to find a good spot to use them. Why spend $80 on a cheap, basic fixture for them? Why not use them in something nicer that costs less? The value proposition just doesn't make sense here. Hue's outdoor floodlights are standard-size bulbs that'll fit into any fixture that accepts PAR38-shaped LEDs. There's no such motion sensor in the Ludere, even though Hue supports motion triggers and sells a motion sensor of its own. ![]() Subtract the cost of the bulbs themselves, which sell in a two-pack for $50, and you're looking at an $80 piece of plastic - more than twice as expensive as similar fixtures that include built-in motion sensors. The Ludere is really just a standard, wired fixture that includes two of Philips' new weatherproof floodlight LEDs. ![]() There's nothing special about the Philips Hue Ludere dual-floodlight fixture, and it costs too much. ![]() ![]() Disclaimer: CNET may get a share of revenue from the sale of the products featured in this list. To answer, I tested them all out at the CNET Smart Home - here's my rundown of each of them, ranked from worst to first. My question: Which of these new smart lights are smart purchases? That's a lot of new smart lights (and it's not even counting new indoor lights like the Hue Signe and Hue Play fixtures and the Hue Adore smart mirror).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |